ePolitix.com stakeholders comment on Gordon Brown's legislative priorities for the next session of Parliament.

The key issues of housing, education and the NHS will top the prime minister's agenda. However the governments agenda will also focus on issues of security and counter-terrorism, climate change and constitutional reform.

Party response: The Labour Party

Prime minister Gordon Brown said: "To respond to the rising aspirations of the British people we must deliver new and better opportunities - in education, employment, the provision of housing and health - to ensure that in a fast changing world there is opportunity and security, not just for some, but for all."

Housing minister Yvette Cooper said: "We have to be more ambitious. We have got to set a higher target, we do need more (housing) because if we don’t, we’ll see first-time-buyers being priced out of the market, we’ll see longer council house waiting lists and we'll see those on the lowest incomes suffer the most.

"We have already very substantially increased the proportion of housing built on brownfield sites, and encouraged local authorities to look for potential brownfield sites among their land stocks.

"Of course, you won’t stop all building on greenfield land because there has always been building on some greenfield land but we’ve made very clear that we want the vast majority of houses to be built on brownfield land."

On housing

Stakeholder response: The CML

To send a comment to the CML, click here

CML senior policy adviser Rob Thomas said: "Innovations in mortgage funding are a key driver for new types of mortgages, so the Treasury is right to examine this area closely. 

"But the issue is just as much about the consumer appetite for long-term fixed rates as about how they are funded.

"It is too early to say whether these announcements will create a significant shift in the design of the mortgage products of the future, but we welcome the government's willingness to look at the funding side and we also welcome the renewed focus on increased housing supply."

Stakeholder response: Help the Aged

To send a comment to Help the Aged, click here

Joe Oldman, senior policy adviser at Help the Aged, said: "While there is comfort that the prime minister is focusing on housing as a key policy direction, he has clearly failed to make any sign of a commitment to lifetime homes and mixed tenure for older people.

"Making houses affordable is one thing, but there must be an onus on making them available for a lifetime.

"The concept of designing 'lifetime neighbourhoods' should therefore be given much higher priority, as opposed to focusing simply on specialist segregated developments, such as retirement villages.

"Given we will experience a rapid expansion in older households over the next 20 years, older people can no longer be considered a marginal group within housing policy.

"With this in mind, we really need to see a 'Decent Homes Plus' initiative that is designed to make housing more adaptable to the needs of older people.

"This would help them stay independent in their own homes – a goal of particular importance for owner-occupiers living in poor housing. 

"Any such initiative should be rolled out nationwide and not just targeted in regeneration areas."

Stakeholder response: The CPRE

To send a comment to The CPRE, click here

The CPRE said: "We welcome the prime minister's promise of robust protection for the green belt, following earlier worrying indications it might be weakened.

"We are also encouraged by Gordon Brown’s emphasis on brownfield regeneration as the key to tackling the nation’s housing needs. 

"While great progress has been made in recent years, there is great scope for recycling more previously developed land and buildings throughout the country.

"The government should set  a new national target of at least 75 per cent of new housing on brownfield land and develop fiscal and policy measures to help achieve this.

"But critically, there should be no decision on housing numbers without full consideration of the environmental consequences.

"In setting housebuilding levels, the government should avoid a return to 'predict and provide'.

"There is also a desperate need to improve the quality of new housing. The focus on subsidised, affordable housing is particularly refreshing. 

"Up to now, politicians have assumed that simply building more market homes will solve the affordability problem.

"In fact there has been a massive decline in the provision of affordable housing since the 1970s, while levels of market housebuilding have increased only slightly.

"Delivering the affordable homes we need will require a significant injection of public funding and more effective planning policies to ensure a better mix of market and affordable housing.

"A more sustainable approach to housing development is urgently needed.

"We need greener housing which regenerates our towns and cities, and meets the needs of rural communities in ways which protect and enhance the countryside.

"We are concerned by Gordon Brown’s indication that the forthcoming Planning Bill would, 'implement the Barker and Eddington reports to speed up the development of major infrastructure projects ... and speed up planning generally'. 

"There is an ongoing consultation on the government’s Planning White Paper. 

"Environmental NGOs are united in saying that many of the proposals in the White Paper will be a disaster for the environment and for local democracy. 

"We fear the prime minister may be pre-empting the outcome of this consultation. 

"In the spirit of his earlier statements about the need to listen to individuals and communities, we urge the prime minister to listen to the serious concerns being expressed about aspects of the White Paper before making final decisions about new legislation."

Stakeholder response: The Construction Products Association

To send a comment to The Construction Products Association , click here

Allan Wilen, economics director at the Association, said: "We welcome the prime minister's moves to increase housing provision by raising the annual house building target for England from 200,000 to 240,000 new homes a year by 2016.

"However, delivering the new target of 240,000 homes will be a significant challenge, particularly given that the 178,000 new homes started last year falls far short of the government’s previous modest aspirations. 

"Planning reform and improved supply of development land are urgently needed if the government is to secure its target, while a substantial increase in infrastructure investment is needed to successfully unlock the potential of development areas such as the Thames Gateway."

Stakeholder response: The NHBC

To send a comment to The NHBC, click here

Imtiaz Farookhi, NHBC’s chief executive, said: "We welcome the prime minister’s growth targets for new house building and the prominence he has given to sustainable and affordable homes.

"Whilst this presents significant challenges to the industry, we are encouraged by the government's commitment to improve the efficiency of the planning system.

"Customer satisfaction remains paramount and is thrown into sharp focus as we work towards improving the environmental performance of new homes. 

"It is essential that consumers are not used as guinea pigs for new technology.

"NHBC will use its unique position working closely with industry, government and consumers to help meet these housing challenges ahead."

Stakeholder response: The Woodland Trust

To send a comment to The Woodland Trust, click here

Lee Bruce of the Woodland Trust said: "We are heartened by the assurances from Gordon Brown that there will be a robust defence of green belt land and would hope that the building of new homes will not put at risk the oft stated desire to build truly sustainable communities.

"Restoring a sense of British identity has been a central theme in Mr Brown’s opening weeks as prime minister and we believe that an emphasis on a shared Britishness should mean protecting and enhancing for the benefit of all our natural environment which is such an important national asset.

"The forthcoming Climate Change Bill will introduce a legal framework for the reduction of emissions through strict targeting. 

"The Woodland Trust would like to see a more ambitious target of an 80 per cent reduction in emissions and far more focus being lent to the issue of how we can help the adaptation of the natural resources upon which we depend.

"Unfortunately there is little sign of rethinking the suggestions made in both the Barker and Eddington reports, and Planning White Paper. The announcement of  intentions to implement the proposals and speed-up the planning system pre-empt the outcome of the current consultation process without guaranteeing a fulsome consideration of the serious concerns expressed by many."

On education

Stakeholder response: The ATL

To send a comment to The ATL, click here

ATL general secretary Dr Mary Bousted said: "ATL – and teachers throughout England and Wales – are very pleased to hear the government does not have any plans for yet another large education Bill.

"We give a qualified support to the proposed Bill. Raising the age of compulsory education or training will not be popular, although it will raise the national levels of achievement.

"The proposed bill will be a challenge for employers, trainers, and those working in schools and colleges. 

"It will only succeed with the government’s target group – the 10 per cent of 16 to 18-year-olds not in education or training - if the curriculum is radically improved to make it relevant and interesting for them.

"The new training levy is good news, but the government should look again at the sums in its Comprehensive Spending Review as increasing the number of students over 16 will require more state funding than previously announced."

Stakeholder response: The ICSA

To send a comment to the ICSA, click here

Deputy director of marketing and communications Suzanne Dobson said: "Along with many other professional bodies we have been hit by the governments decision not fund, through the LSCs, professional education. 

"Given that also on the agenda is a need for a more highly skilled workforce and a desire to encourage people into employment and to better paid – for example, more sustainable jobs; this seems a contradiction. 

"So I guess one of my thoughts is about more coherence across policies."

Stakeholder response: Cipd

To send a comment to Cipd, click here

Martyn Sloman, CIPD skills adviser said: "Many of the proposals contained within the education and skills bill are aimed at giving young people and lower-skilled employees access to training.

"The duty on employers to release young people to undertake training and check that they are participating before employing them is particularly noteworthy.

"However, while HR will be expected to encourage and check that such training is being carried out, it should not be the employer’s role to enforce this policy."

Ben Willmott, CIPD employee relations adviser added: "We are delighted that the government is acting upon the the Gibbons review recommendations made earlier this year, particularly in scrapping the statutory dispute resolution procedures.

"As CIPD research shows, these have done little to improve the dispute resolution process, and actually made things worse."

Charles Cotton, CIPD reward adviser, commenting on the new Pension Bill said: "Many of the proposals contained in the Pensions Bill would improve access to occupational pension schemes without harming employers or existing pension arrangements.

"As CIPD research shows, the introduction of mandatory employer contributions would not lead to a levelling down of existing pension arrangements.

"Such an introduction also levels the playing field between companies, which may stimulate fairer competition."

Stakeholder response: The NCPTA