ePolitix Dods
  • Log-out
  • Logged-in as: Sue Perkins
  • Home
  • Policy
  • Legislation
  • The 1832 Blog
  • Events
  • Member Directory
    • Parliament & Government
    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • International & Defence
    • Energy & Environment
    • Economy
    • Transport
    • Science & Tech

    Volcanic ash and future implications for UK aviation and consumers

    Bookmark and Share

    Member News

    BA avoids 'uproar' as Willie Walsh turns down annual bonus

    Unite praises cabin crew's dignity but asks BA what has it got to hide?

    Independent report uncovers British Airways' climate of fear

    BA strike update day 16

    Derek Simpson and Tony Woodley to join the BA picket line


    By Andrew Haines, chief executive of the Civil Aviation Authority
    - 8th July 2010
    The CAA’s sole aim in this is minimise disruption without compromising passenger safety should our airspace be contaminated by ash again.

    Andrew Haines

    Andrew Haines, chief executive of the Civil Aviation Authority, writes for ePolitix ahead of Tuesday’s briefing for MPs on volcanic ash disruption.

    Icelandic volcanic ash has been deposited in the UK at least ten times over the last 1000 years; the last occasion being in 1947. In geological terms, the gap between 1947 and 2010 is an instant, but in that time UK civil aviation grew from carrying one million people a year to over 218m. The possibility of volcanic ash reducing the numbers of flights in UK airspace to zero for six days was similarly unprecedented until earlier this year, and it took a unique combination of events to bring it about.

    First, the Icelandic volcano, Eyjafjallajökull, is a glacial volcano which meant that its eruption led to enormous volumes of fine particles of ash at high levels in the atmosphere. Secondly, due to atypical weather conditions, that ash was pushed towards the UK and then did not disperse naturally but sat in some of the busiest airspace in the world for several days.

    The longstanding worldwide guidance to operators is to stay well clear of ash – “regardless of concentration, AVOID, AVOID, AVOID”. This approach was developed after serious safety incidents, for example total engine failure when a BA aircraft flew through ash in Indonesia. It was the combination of this guidance, and heavy air traffic demand on UK airspace that led UK air traffic control provider NATS to withdraw its services and effectively close airspace when it became contaminated with ash.

    The problems facing European aviation were real - the standard response to avoid ash by flying around it was not possible in congested European airspace. The obvious answer was to let aircraft fly through ash at agreed, safe levels, but engine manufacturers had set engine tolerance to ash at zero. In addition, there was real uncertainty around the precise volume of ash being emitted by the volcano and hence not even the best model of its type in the world could readily and accurately predict not just where ash might be found but, importantly the density of ash that might be encountered in any given area.

    In the face of such uncertainty, regulators were faced with a decision on whether to set an arbitrary new standard or seek objective evidence. Our challenge at the CAA was to work, on behalf of the international aviation community, with engine manufacturers in particular, to define a safe threshold and ensure that the modelling and validation was of a sufficiently high standard to allow aircraft to operate with certainty at that new threshold. All of this took place over five days from April 15th, and flights were able to resume on the evening of April 20th, within hours of the manufacturers providing assurance of revised parameters for safe flying.

    This work is on going in the knowledge that the recent ceasation of activity from Eyjafjallajökull does not mean that the threat has gone away for ever. Work continues, aimed at minimising disruption to the travelling public through the development of enhancements to modelling capability, further analysis of airworthiness conditions to refine the assessment of the safe threshold of ash tolerance, and operational and other measures to allow more flexibility around where aircraft can operate when some ash is present, and how those zones are set and monitored in a consistent fashion throughout Europe.

    Many of the improvements must come from industry and the CAA will continue to facilitate progress with airlines, engine manufacturers and with our colleagues at NATS, the Met Office, and the Department for Transport. The UK cannot act unilaterally in an international environment such as this and we will continue to feed our progress back to our partners in Europe and the International Civil Aviation Organisation. The CAA’s sole aim in this is minimise disruption without compromising passenger safety should our airspace be contaminated by ash again.

    The Civil Aviation Authority, British Geological Survey, the Met Office and NATS are holding a briefing for MPs and Peers on 13 July at 11.30 - 12.30 in Committee Room 19.

    Bookmark and Share

    Have your say...

    Please enter your comments below.

    Name

    Your e-mail address


    Listen to audio version

    Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

    Related News

    Budget June 2010: Key points

    ePolitix election focus: transport

    Transport: Measures of confidence

    Transport: Precautionary tales

    Transport: Checks and balances





    Latest on transport

    Volcanic ash and future implications for UK aviation and consumers


    Call to protect road network projects


    Motorway expansion would bring 'much needed regeneration'




    Latest news

    Spending cuts website filled with 'drivel'


    'Common sense' needed in farming


    New MP highlights self-determination


    More from ePolitix.com


    RSS feeds

    • News
    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Researcher articles
    • Legislation

    Policy

    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • More...

    Archives

    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Member articles
    • Blog posts
    • ePolitix.com comment

    The House Magazine

    • About the magazine
    • Contact the magazine
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • Articles archive
    • Contact us
    • Terms and conditions
    • Advertising opportunities
    • About our Members
    • Services for parliamentarians
    • Sign up for free politics bulletins

    More from Dods


    • Dods.co.uk
    • Dods people
    • Dods monitoring
    • Dods Events
    • Dods Training
    • Public affairs news
    • The Parliament
    • Public sector delivery
    • Westminster briefing
    • The House magazine
    • Civil Service Network
    • ePolitix
    • Euro Source
    • Civil Service Live
    • The training Journal
    Dods logo
    © Dods Ltd 2010