Two professors appointed to Lords


By Tony Grew
- 11th October 2010

The House of Lords appointments commission has announced the creation of two non-political peers.

Professor Peter Hennessy, an expert in contemporary British history, and Professor Sheila Hollins, a psychiatrist whose work has focused on the mental and physical health of people with learning disabilities, will take up their seats at a later date.

Their titles have not yet been decided and they will sit as cross-benchers.

The commission selects new independent members of the House of Lords and vets party-political nominations put forward by the parties.

Independent peers are selected on merit and on their commitment to the work of the House of Lords.

The commission aims to "add to the breadth of expertise and experience that already exists within the House and to ensure that the House of Lords represents the diversity of the people of the UK".

Since it was established in 2000, the commission has now recommended a total of 57 non-party-political peerages to the prime minister, drawn from well over 4,000 nominations.

Peter Hennessy is Attlee Professor of Contemporary British History at Queen Mary, University of London, and a Fellow of the British Academy.

He has written a number of books including Never Again: Britain 1945-51, The Secret State, The Hidden Wiring: Unearthing The British Constitution, Cabinet and Whitehall.

Sheila Hollins is Professor in Psychiatry of Disability at St. George's, University of London.

Her research has focussed on clinical and social aspects of the mental and physical health of people with learning disabilities, with a particular focus on bereavement, palliative care and sexual abuse.

Since 2008 she has served as the Chair of the WHO Steering Group to develop a declaration and action plan on the health of children and young people with intellectual disabilities.



Article Comments

Two professors with similar backgrounds to the nominating committee. This House of Lords Appointments Commission has been a serious disappointment. Where are the people's peers that work at the grassroots level?

James Mac
12th Oct 2010 at 2:57 pm

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

New end of life charter welcomed

Charities urge health reforms revision

Lord Speaker to stand down

Peers experiment with online engagement

Peers' expenses claims published



Latest news

One third of new MPs took £30,000 pay cut

More than half of the new MPs elected in 2010 took a pay cut to enter Parliament, a report published today revealed.


Post-Panorama: why we must not forget the hard lessons of the last two weeks

The last two weeks have been dominated by two high-profile stories which shone a harsh spotlight on the poor treatment of many people with learning disabilities in our society, writes Jaime Gill, head of press and public affairs for United Response.


Lib Dems and Tories 'get on better than Blair and Brown'

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have managed to forge a coalition which is remarkably harmonious, effective and decisive, according to a report by constitutional experts.


Big Society: replacing citizen activism with neighbourliness


'Is the Big Society still on course to deliver?'


Green deal 'will protect consumers'


MPs expenses figures published


UKBA 'still not fit for purpose'


More from Dods


  • Dods.co.uk
  • Dods Shop
  • Dods People
  • Dods Legislation
  • Public Affairs News
  • The Parliament
  • Civil Service Live Network
  • Dods Monitoring
  • Training Journal
  • Westminster Explained
  • Westminster Briefing
  • Electus