ePolitix Dods
  • Log-out
  • Logged-in as: Sue Perkins
  • Home
  • Policy
  • Legislation
  • The 1832 Blog
  • Events
  • Member Directory
    • Parliament & Government
    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • International & Defence
    • Energy & Environment
    • Economy
    • Transport
    • Communities

    The case to end Sinn Fein allowances

    Bookmark and Share

    Member News

    The NASUWT comments on Sinn Fein manifesto

    MPs and legal aid

    Disheartened entrepreneurs turn to politics ahead of the general election

    Public support MPs staff


    By Nigel Dodds MP
    - 29th June 2010

    Nigel Dodds MP writes for ePolitix.com ahead of his Westminster Hall debate on payment of allowances to MPs who refuse to take their seats.

    The Democratic Unionist Party has consistently sought to remedy as many mistakes of the peace process as it can. This is neither a simple nor an easy task. We choose to persist with it to ensure that the Northern Ireland for which so many sacrifices were made is fully achieved.

    One such error was granting parliamentary allowances to Sinn Fein despite their refusal to take their seats at Westminster.

    Two Speakers of the House had ruled against granting Sinn Fein these allowances. Sinn Fein challenged this decision claiming the refusal was a denial of their voters' rights. The courts rejected these arguments. The decisions in each case was shown to be right and just.

    The Blair government chose to ignore this and grant allowances to Sinn Fein. This created a two-tier structure for Members of Parliament. This "special status" was not a decision based on any sort of principle. It was simply an unnecessary concession to a selfish demand. Sinn Fein itself has made this clear. When challenged on their questionable use of accommodation allowances a Sinn Fein spokesperson defended it by saying:

    "This was agreed as part of the political negotiations eight or nine years ago."

    So questionable motivation led to a poor decision and created a bad principle. With a change in government there is an opportunity for legitimate motivation to result in a sensible decision and to re-establish a good principle – that all MPs should be treated in the same manner with no special treatment for one party.

    Whilst in opposition the Conservatives made clear on repeated occasions their opposition to granting parliamentary allowances to Sinn Fein. Spokesperson after spokesperson stated their opposition to the decision and even sought to have the decision reversed in the House. This opposition was summed up when the now Northern Ireland secretary Owen Patterson stated: "It is inconceivable that incoming Conservative MPs would vote to continue paying millions of pounds of public money to elected members who do not take their seats."

    Now the opportunity to act has come they have become inexplicably reticent. The Liberal Democrats allowed their MPs a free vote on this issue so it is hard to see the new coalition arrangements being the explanation.

    The battle to regain public confidence in Parliament has by no means been won. The more delivery in government on promises made in opposition the better. It is good politics.

    In an era of budget cuts it is easy to think that what are described as 'small' amounts of money don't matter. As Jen Henriksson, a Swedish official who oversaw their budget consolidation argues in his ten lessons:

    "Do not forget the law of small numbers. One million here and two million there and we are talking real money. Never trust a minister of finance who says that you do not need to worry about pocket money."

    In the course of this Parliament Sinn Fein would receive between £3-4m in allowances. Ending these allowances is good budgeting.

    It can be hard to find an issue where good principle, good politics and good budgeting meet. When they do the sensible thing to do is act.

    Bookmark and Share

    Article Comments

    It is funny how people like Nigel Dodds, when arguing on expenses, will affirm that the role of an MP goes far beyond the chamber, but is quite happy to forget this when arguing what is basically a partisan point against a party who he dislikes and on a ideological point he disagrees with. The role of an MP does go far beyond their work in the chamber. I am sure their MPs are able to do much to represent their voters and exercise their democratic mandate in the lobbies and to stop this, in defence of an antiquated ruling on an oath of allegiance, which takes no account of the special situation in Northern Ireland, would do a disservice to the people of Northern Ireland that elected them.

    philip, london
    30th Jun 2010 at 4:51 pm

    Have your say...

    Please enter your comments below.

    Name

    Your e-mail address


    Listen to audio version

    Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

    Related News

    Ipsa told to cut running costs

    Expenses website launch will clash with Commons debate

    No. 10 confirms names of ministerial aides

    Laing spoiling for AV fight

    Tories announce new PPS appointments



    Latest news

    May announces migration reform

    The home secretary has announced a series of changes to immigration policy in the House of Commons.


    Clarke 'frustrated' by departmental leaks

    The justice secretary has said he shares the frustration of Labour MPs about leaks from his department.


    Government 'capping economic growth'

    London First claims businesses will "not be throwing a party", following Theresa May's announcements on the immigration cap.


    Courts 'should deal with MP phone hacking'


    Ipsa told to cut running costs


    Immigration loophole


    Beckett joins standards committee


    Good governance 'rooted in Commonwealth values'


    More from ePolitix.com


    RSS feeds

    • News
    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Researcher articles
    • Legislation

    Policy

    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • More...

    Archives

    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Member articles
    • Blog posts
    • ePolitix.com comment

    The House Magazine

    • About the magazine
    • Contact the magazine
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • Articles archive
    • Contact us
    • Terms and conditions
    • Advertising opportunities
    • About our Members
    • Services for parliamentarians
    • Sign up for free politics bulletins

    More from Dods


    • Dods.co.uk
    • Dods people
    • Dods monitoring
    • Dods Events
    • Dods Training
    • Public affairs news
    • The Parliament
    • Public sector delivery
    • Westminster briefing
    • The House magazine
    • Civil Service Network
    • ePolitix
    • Euro Source
    • Civil Service Live
    • The training Journal
    Dods logo
    © Dods Ltd 2010