ePolitix Dods
  • Log-out
  • Logged-in as: Sue Perkins
  • Home
  • Policy
  • Legislation
  • The 1832 Blog
  • Events
  • Member Directory
    • Parliament & Government
    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • International & Defence
    • Energy & Environment
    • Economy
    • Transport
    • Communities

    Spending review is just the beginning

    Bookmark and Share

    Member News

    LGA heralds recognition of councils' vital role in adult care white paper

    MPs and Peers to hear views of people with learning disabilities on their eye health needs

    United Response welcomes inquiry into disability harassment

    Law Society and Mencap join forces to protect vulnerable people from unregulated will writers

    Dyslexia

    United Response21st October 2010

    Su Sayer OBE, chief executive of United Response looks at the impact of the spending review on adults with learning disabilities.

    Today's comprehensive spending review contained a mixture of good and bad news for adults with learning disabilities or mental health needs. While the 2bn pounds in extra funding for social care was a positive move, the fact that it is not ring-fenced means it is too soon to say whether already overstretched local authorities will be able to use it to offset the huge cuts they are facing overall. Similarly, there are serious concerns about whether the vast reductions in welfare may end up hitting people with disabilities disproportionately.

    Still, it should be remembered that as significant as the comprehensive spending review was, it was not the end of the matter. There is still a long road ahead, and local authorities will be wrestling with their budgets and where and how to make savings for many months to come.

    That's why those of us in the voluntary sector who provide public services must keep striving towards the best possible outcomes for the people who rely on our support. Many organisations and individuals will be deeply worried and unsure of the future today, but we need to work together with everyone – the individuals affected, their families, the government and local authorities - to find the most creative and efficient ways of delivering support and care to those who most need it.

    None of this will be easy but we must do all we can to make it work for the sake of the millions for whom such services are a lifeline.

    Bookmark and Share

    Article Comments

    I am very concerned about the removal of the mobility component of DLA. I think it will have a devastating effect on the quality of life for severely disabled adults in residential care. The voluntary sector responsible for providing the care will not be able to get more money from strap cashed local authorities. We still do not know what role Motability will take in all this, or whether it will even exist in the near future.
    It can be very difficult for certain learning disabled people who have challenging behaviours to share a vehicle with others.
    The cuts could mean that these vulnerable adults' quality of life will diminish as they will be forced to remain either indoors or on-site for large periods of the day. The disruption of the usual pattern of their day will confuse them and result in deteriorating behaviours.
    I don't think that the proposal has been thought through properly.

    Louisa Spivack
    1st Nov 2010 at 9:55 pm

    Have your say...

    Please enter your comments below.

    Name

    Your e-mail address


    Listen to audio version

    Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

    Related News

    Interview: Paul Maynard MP

    Two professors appointed to Lords

    May praises equality law

    Better care needed for patients with learning disabilities

    Disabled voters 'disenfranchised' by access barriers



    Latest news

    No date yet for Laws' return

    David Laws has said there is "a process to be observed" before he can return to government.


    Plan to cut cost of Commons by £20m

    Plans to cut the cost of Parliament by over £20m by 2015 include reducing staff costs, selling property and charging for tours of Big Ben.


    Clegg leaves out people with learning disabilities

    Responding to Nick Clegg's announced plans to increase levels of electoral registration, Su Sayer, chief executive of United Response, asks why people with learning disabilities were not included in the list of the disenfranchised.


    Former MPs go to the Lords


    Enterprise tsar resigns following 'unacceptable' remarks


    A long afternoon with the liaison committee


    Minister rejects compulsory fire alarms


    'If you don't have insurance, nothing works'


    More from ePolitix.com


    RSS feeds

    • News
    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Researcher articles
    • Legislation

    Policy

    • Education
    • Health
    • Home Affairs
    • Culture
    • More...

    Archives

    • MP articles
    • Peer articles
    • Member articles
    • Blog posts
    • ePolitix.com comment

    The House Magazine

    • About the magazine
    • Contact the magazine
    • Advertising
    • Subscriptions
    • Articles archive
    • Contact us
    • Terms and conditions
    • Advertising opportunities
    • About our Members
    • Services for parliamentarians
    • Sign up for free politics bulletins

    More from Dods


    • Dods.co.uk
    • Dods people
    • Dods monitoring
    • Dods Events
    • Dods Training
    • Public affairs news
    • The Parliament
    • Public sector delivery
    • Westminster briefing
    • The House magazine
    • Civil Service Network
    • ePolitix
    • Euro Source
    • Civil Service Live
    • The training Journal
    Dods logo
    © Dods Ltd 2010