MPs vote in favour of tuition fees

9th December 2010

MPs have voted 323 to 302 to approve a tripling of tuition fees for students in England.

The government's majority was cut from 84 to just 21.

Earlier Vince Cable had defended the coalition's plan to increase tuition fees as demonstrators clashed with police in Parliament Square.

Battling heckles in the Commons from the Labour benches, the business secretary said the new policy was "more progressive than the existing system" and more progressive than the Browne review on which the policy is based.

"That means just a little under 25 per cent of all future graduates will pay less than they do under the current system that we inherited," he told MPs.

And he said Labour had "miserably failed" to help poorer people get to university during their time in office and left a "shameful inheritance" on social mobility.

Cable told MPs that there had been "very difficult choices to make" but in the end he had opted for a set of policies which provided a "strong base for university funding".

It would create a "significantly more progressive system of graduate payments".

Under the plans universities would be able to charge £6,000 a year and up to £9,000 in "exceptional circumstances".

The current fee cap is £3,290.

Students will not pay any fees upfront and will only begin to pay them back when they earn £21,000.

Demonstrators clashed with police outside Parliament as MPs prepared to vote on the plans.

Labour's John Denham said the changes to tuition fees would leave an "untried, untested and unstable market for students" and he called on MPs from all sides to vote against the proposal.

And while he said his speech would not be a "good party political knockabout ... no sane person" would promote the changes to tuition fees in the way the government had.

"So much of the media coverage of this issue has been dominated by Liberal Democrats splits we could be forgiven for thinking today's vote is about the future of the Lib Dems," he said.

"It's about the something much more important than that.

"There are millions of parents and millions of students who don’t care about the Lib Dems but they do care about the huge fee increase.

"If this Tory measure goes through with support or abstention of Lib Dems that party will forfeit the right to call themselves a progressive political party."

And he attacked David Cameron and Nick Clegg for not remaining in the Commons for the rest of the debate.

Both the prime minister and the deputy prime minister left the chamber soon after Cable sat down.

Julian Lewis (Con, New Forest East) said it is a sad day when young people are deterred from going to university.

Jeremy Corbyn (Lab, Islington North) said rather than kettling young people in Parliament Square, students should be welcomed into parliament.

He told Cable he should be "ashamed of himself" and urged the government to tax people "because they are wealthy".

Summing up the debate, shadow minister Gareth Thomas said it had been "passionate and robust".

He accused Nick Clegg and David Cameron of becoming the nation's "premier loan sharks" with no escape for graduates from higher debt.

Thomas said families are being let down, especially when the plans to abolish EMA in January are considered.

"We speak for those ordinary working people," he said to Tory jeers.

"An abstention tonight is not enough."

Universities minister David Willetts said all three parties confronted the issue of university funding and reached the same conclusion.

He said the Conservatives voted against tuition fees in 2004, but he is now convinced by evidence that despite the cost of university rising, the proportion of people in England going to university continued to rise.

Willetts said the new policy is an improvement on Labour's, with a higher repayment threshold and a new £150m scholarship fund.

In conclusion he said the government's tuition fees policy is fair, progressive and puts power in the hands of students.

MPs then voted in favour of the rise in fees, but 21 Lib Dems, including former leaders Ming Campbell and Charles Kennedy, voted no.

During the afternoon Lib Dem ministerial aides Mike Crockart and Jenny Willott announced they intended to resign from his post in order to vote against the plans.

On the eve of the crucial ballot, deputy Lib Dem leader Simon Hughes revealed he intended to abstain.

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

The foundations of the policy change are idealogically conservative, but in practice, Liberal. This increase in tuition spells the start of a change for the English education system. We have long fell behind the funding and innovation of the American system, in which we have moved one step closer to.

The anger from students is understandable: they will have to pay three time the amount they paid before. Any citizen of the country would be angry if the price of something they wanted, suddenly increased three-fold.

I am a graduate myself and I favour the rise, on the grounds that all citizens have to take a hit in the current economic climate. With millions out of work, should one sector be favoured over another, if it does give tangible state benefits?

I think the key to reforming the education system is based firmly in competition, achievement and scholarships. We must move towards a system which promotes high achievement and offers full university scholarships to the brighest and most gifted. I believe that every core subject area needs these to ensure that the next generation of students going through university are the best and all citizens of this country have an equal chance in life, through education.

However, I believe that only the top 5/10% of entrants into university should recieve a full scholarship, with another 30% receiving a partial scholarship. These should of course be focused in areas with tangible benefits to the taxpayer: health, education, innovation, science, mathematics...etc.

Full scholarships would instill at incentive to achieve and remove the burden of debt and financial troubles for the brightest students going to university- ensuring that they can study to the best of their ability.

The government must realise that this sort of education policy must be coupled with additional funding to ensure the system is fit for purpose- and ensures those who deserve to be at university, will be at university.

Darren Murphy
14th Dec 2010 at 1:54 am

Nick Clegg and Vince Cable looking to be in power to make money. They donot bother about the poor children in this country.

Also Nick Clegg is not going to get another chance to lead his party this is the once chance he can get power.

Also Vince Cable not intend to be seeking reelection for the next term

mathew
10th Dec 2010 at 12:59 pm

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Lords to debate tuition fees

Police face questions over fees protest

21 Lib Dems voted against tuition fees

Lib Dem MPs quit in protest

MPs to vote on tuition fees



Latest news

From Thatcher's guru to Cameron's headache

Famous for being the cabinet minister who brought Margaret Thatcher solutions, Lord Young last month brought David Cameron only headaches.


Is charitable giving the answer to the City's tarnished reputation?

Hannah Terrey, head of policy and public affairs at the Charities Aid Foundation, writes in support of Hazel Blears' ten-minute rule bill encouraging banks to bring about the 'Big Society'


Chancellor outlines Ireland loan deal

The chancellor has outlined to Parliament details of the £3.25bn loan being offered to help bail out Ireland's economy.


MPs' expenses 'not accounted for'


MP says no to 'Stratford Hotspur'


ePolitix.com: PMQs briefing


Paterson pressed over security budget


NHS funding dominates PMQs


More from Dods