MPs overwhelmingly back Libya operations


By Tony Grew
- 21st March 2011

MPs have voted 557 to 13 in favour of UK military operations in Libya.

50 backbench members were able to express their views during the debate on the UN security council resolution authorising action against the Gaddafi regime to protect civilians.

At the end of the debate foreign secretary William Hague said there had been "nothing gleeful or gung-ho about the atmosphere of the House or the decisions of the government".

He argued "it is right to act" to prevent Gaddafi's forces massacring civilians, but that action had not been "automatic or unthinking".

He said the UK had to become involved because it is a permanent member of the UN security council with the military capability to act swiftly.

Indeed he said if this country had not involved itself the UN resolution would not have happened at all.

He said military action was the only way the Libyan people would be able to stand up to the regime without being killed.

Shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander said the UK has a moral duty to act, and the Labour party believes multi-lateral action should be used to save lives.

He said the UK must be unequivocal in its condemnation of violence in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, and those governments must know that a security response "cannot be an alternative to political reform".

At the start of the debate prime minister David Cameron said that coalition forces enforcing UN Security Council resolution 1973 had "largely neutralised Libyan air defences" and as a result a no-fly zone had "effectively been put in place over Libya".

"It is also clear that coalition forces have helped to avert what could have been a bloody massacre in Benghazi. In my view they did so just in the nick of time," he said.

And he rejected the suggestion from one backbench MP that the West should have waited until Arab planes could be in the air before it intervened.

"If we had waited for that, Benghazi would have fallen and, from that, probably Tobruk would have fallen and Gaddafi would have rolled up the whole of his country in the next 24 to 48 hours," Cameron said.

He added: "There was an urgent need to stop the slaughter."

But the prime minister said the intervention in Libya was "different from Iraq".

"This is about protecting people and giving the Libyan people a chance to shape their own destiny," he said.

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

The Libya questions Cameron did not answer

Wikileaks 'endanger British troops'

Prime minister - Statement in full

Sex education on youth parliament agenda

Labour faces voter 'crisis'



Latest news

NOTW admits to phone hacking

News International has accepted liability for the hacking of mobile phones by journalists at its News of the World tabloid.


Lord Speaker's election 'should be held in July'

The House of Lords procedure committee has suggested changes to the election of the Lord Speaker.


Labour review 'must support creative SMEs'

The Labour party's review into the creative industries must take account of the role of small-scale creative businesses, a leading arts body has said.


MPs criticise BBC IT project


Former minister admits fiddling expenses


Clegg: 'I'm not a punchbag'


Shapps launches DIY tenants repairs scheme


Charities set out high speed rail charter


More from Dods