Lords could obstruct coalition programme

28th January 2011

The government may face increasing opposition in the House of Lords as questions are raised about whether the tradition that sees manifesto commitments pass applies to the coalition.

In a report published today, the House of Commons political and constitutional reform committee warned that a coalition government’s programme, drawn up after an election, cannot have the same mandate as a party manifesto which is available to the people before they vote.

MPs said a possible consequence was that members of the House of Lords may not feel bound by the Salisbury-Addison convention which governs the relationship between the Commons and the Lords.

The tradition has been that the unelected peers do not vote against measures included in the governing party's manifesto or subject them to "wrecking amendments" which would change the government's intentions.

But it has been left up to individual peers to determine whether to apply the convention to current legislation emerging from the coalition programme for government.

The committee recommended that one way to address the lack of a direct mandate is to ensure that the House of Commons is given the opportunity to subject the government’s proposals to full pre-legislative scrutiny.

The problem has been exposed in the current wrangling in the Lords over the Parliamentary Voting and Constituencies Bill.

A senior peer told ePolitix.com's sister publication The House Magazine last week that some members "can’t face coming in on a Monday" due to the "very unfortunate atmosphere" in the Lords.

And the convener of the crossbench peers, Baroness D'Souza, has warned that the break down of the traditions and conventions could even mark the beginning of the end of the Lords in its current form.

"The tactics that the Opposition are using to delay the Bill fly in the face of the conventions that have governed this House for perhaps the past six decades," she said.

"These tactics undoubtedly bring this House into disrepute, that any success of such tactics may well encourage their further future use, and that these factors put together may even mark the beginning of the dissolution of this House."

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

You're wrong because the House of Lords will pick its fights - mainly on constitutional matters.

They've accepted all other Government bills this Parliament.

Jack Simpson
28th Jan 2011 at 1:44 pm

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Peers experiment with online engagement

Crossbenchers attack Labour 'delaying tactics'

Parliament set to 'free our Bills'

Ukip ask for more peers

Peers' expenses claims published



Latest news

Do you support the Health Bill?

Prior to the second reading of the Health Bill in the House of Commons ePolitix.com members put forward their views on reforming the NHS


Peers experiment with online engagement

Members of the public will be able to contribute to a debate in the Lords next week.


Lords could obstruct coalition programme

The government may face increasing opposition in the House of Lords as questions are raised about whether the tradition that sees manifesto commitments pass applies to the coalition.


Cameron: 'economy making progress'


May takes Raab to task over equality


Phone hacking 'equal to Watergate'


Insurance law 'will save motorists money'


ePolitix.com members respond to the Education Bill


More from Dods