Government has no choice on prisoners vote

11th January 2011

Ken Clarke has told MPs he has no choice but to allow some prisoners to vote in elections.

Speaking in the Commons this afternoon the justice secretary told MPs that to ignore a ruling from the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) would expose the taxpayer to millions of pounds worth of compensation claims from prisoners.

Under the proposals prisoners serving up to four years in prison will be able to vote in general elections by proxy or by post in their normal constituency of residence.

Clarke said that the four year threshold was decided upon after receiving legal advice and that it was a "rational line" that was drawn in order to comply with legal obligations

Tory MP James Gray said that the move would mean 6,000 violent offenders, 2,000 sex offenders and 4,500 drug offenders would be able to vote.

The North Wiltshire MP branded the move "wholly offensive and unacceptable" and said it should be Parliament which decided such matters not the ECHR.

Gray called on Clarke to follow the lead of countries such as Belgium and set the threshold at four months rather than four years.

But Clarke warned that the government had to accept the ruling even if it disagreed.

"If he really wishes to really enrage his constituents and mine he will run the risks of thousands of prisoners being given compensation for their lost rights," the justice secretary said.

"We are in government I'm afraid, as I often find myself saying to our Liberal Democrat colleagues, we have to act responsibility whatever our feelings about the wisdom of the decision.

"We have taken legal advice on what is necessary," he said. "No doubt the previous government did too when they suggested a four year margin themselves.

"I urge members not to go too far beyond understandable annoyance and start committing themselves to a course that will cost the taxpayer tens of millions of pounds."

Bookmark and Share

Article Comments

I wonder when they do vote which constituency will they vote in?

Wendy
12th Jan 2011 at 12:57 pm

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Elliot Morley jailed for expenses fraud

Prison policy focused on 'what works'

The ambassador from Ipswich

Parliament set to defy Europe on prisoner votes

Civil liberties speech in full - Deputy prime minister



Latest news

One third of new MPs took £30,000 pay cut

More than half of the new MPs elected in 2010 took a pay cut to enter Parliament, a report published today revealed.


Post-Panorama: why we must not forget the hard lessons of the last two weeks

The last two weeks have been dominated by two high-profile stories which shone a harsh spotlight on the poor treatment of many people with learning disabilities in our society, writes Jaime Gill, head of press and public affairs for United Response.


Lib Dems and Tories 'get on better than Blair and Brown'

The Conservatives and Liberal Democrats have managed to forge a coalition which is remarkably harmonious, effective and decisive, according to a report by constitutional experts.


Big Society: replacing citizen activism with neighbourliness


'Is the Big Society still on course to deliver?'


Green deal 'will protect consumers'


MPs expenses figures published


UKBA 'still not fit for purpose'


More from Dods