Cuts to police services 'ill-planned and drastic'

Police Federation of England & Wales24th February 2011

Paul McKeever, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, urges the home secretary to remove the "shackles of financial restraint" from the police.

According to new research published today the British public say they would be worried if the police stopped providing the current range of services, as a result of budget cuts by this government.

In a survey, commissioned by the Police Federation of England and Wales and undertaken by Ipsos MORI, 86 percent of the general public said they would be worried if the police stopped providing the range of services outlined by interviewers; 44 percent say they would be very worried.

The home secretary, Theresa May, has made clear on a number of occasions that the government view is that police officers should just fight crime, but the reality is that police officers do a whole lot more.

The findings from the survey published today show that the public think the police are responsible for a number of services which are not fighting crime, with 84 percent saying they believe the police are responsible for intervening in domestic rows and disputes; 23 percent saying they believe the police are responsible for arranging for vulnerable children to be taken in to care; and 39 percent saying the police are responsible for monitoring offenders who have been released from prison.

Indeed, the public feel the police should continue to be responsible for providing a wide range of non-crime fighting related services such as caring for victims and witnesses of crime (57 percent); monitoring offenders who have been released from prison (52 percent); intervening in domestic rows and disputes (48 percent); and arranging for vulnerable children to be taken in to care (34 percent).

Paul McKeever, chairman of the Police Federation of England and Wales, says:

"This is the reality of the ill-planned and drastic cut to the policing budget imposed by this coalition government. It clearly demonstrates that the public have a very different view about what they want and expect of their police service, compared to the government's blinkered view that policing should be purely fighting crime.

"The home secretary needs to take heed of today's findings. If the police service is able to do all that the public expects of it, it will need the shackles of financial restraint urgently removed. A cut of 20 per cent over the next four years will inevitably lead to a poorer service, increased crime rates and will seriously jeopardise public safety and the security of the nation."

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Civil liberties speech in full - Deputy prime minister

Herbert defends police plans

Police will 'learn lessons' from Millbank violence

Police forces 'need power to make officers redundant'

LGA brands police commissioners 'dangerous'



Latest news

Brian Haw evicted from Parliament Square

Anti-war protestor Brian Haw has lost his fight against eviction from the edge of Parliament Square.


Social care faces £1.2bn funding shortfall

Social care is facing a budget shortfall of £1.23bn by 2014/15 due to cuts in local authority grants.


Farmers 'losing £20 per pig'

MPs have called on the government to pressure retailers to give pig farmers a fair price for their produce.


MPs warn over migration data


Cameron and Miliband go retro


MP urges city status for Medway


Rising fuel costs 'squeezing millions'


Millionaires invited to Britain


More from Dods