|
How the votes lined up
The full details of how MPs and peers voted on the options for reforming the House of Lords.
Unicameral parliament
- Commons - rejected by 390 to 172
Option 1 - fully appointed
- Commons - rejected by 323 to 245
- Lords - supported by 335 to 110
Option 2 - fully elected
- Commons - rejected by 289 to 272
- Lords - rejected by 329 to 106
Option 3 - 80 per cent appointed/20 per cent elected
- Commons - rejected without a vote
- Lords - rejected by 376 to 39
Option 4 - 80 per cent elected/20 per cent appointed
- Commons - rejected by 284 votes to 281
- Lords - rejected by 339 to 93
Option 5 - 60 per cent appointed/40 per cent elected
- Commons - rejected without a vote
- Lords - rejected by 359 to 60
Option 6 - 60 per cent elected/40 per cent appointed
- Commons - rejected by 316 to 253
- Lords - rejected by 318 to 91
Option 7 - 50 per cent appointed/50 per cent elected
- Commons - rejected without a vote
- Lords - rejected by 322 to 84
|
Published: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:00:00 GMT+00
|
|