Westminster Scotland Wales London Northern Ireland European Union Local
ePolitix.com

 
[ Advanced Search ]

Login | Contact | Terms | Accessibility

How the votes lined up

The full details of how MPs and peers voted on the options for reforming the House of Lords.

Unicameral parliament

  • Commons - rejected by 390 to 172

  • Lords - No vote held

Option 1 - fully appointed

  • Commons - rejected by 323 to 245

  • Lords - supported by 335 to 110

Option 2 - fully elected

  • Commons - rejected by 289 to 272

  • Lords - rejected by 329 to 106

Option 3 - 80 per cent appointed/20 per cent elected

  • Commons - rejected without a vote

  • Lords - rejected by 376 to 39

Option 4 - 80 per cent elected/20 per cent appointed

  • Commons - rejected by 284 votes to 281

  • Lords - rejected by 339 to 93

Option 5 - 60 per cent appointed/40 per cent elected

  • Commons - rejected without a vote

  • Lords - rejected by 359 to 60

Option 6 - 60 per cent elected/40 per cent appointed

  • Commons - rejected by 316 to 253

  • Lords - rejected by 318 to 91

Option 7 - 50 per cent appointed/50 per cent elected

  • Commons - rejected without a vote

  • Lords - rejected by 322 to 84

Published: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 01:00:00 GMT+00

» STAKEHOLDER LINKS

BG Group - Welcome