A sceptical electorate may be given a "none of the above" option in UK elections.

The Electoral Commission's review follows widespread concern over the low turnout at last year's general election when the number of voters taking part slumped to just 59 per cent - the lowest level since 1918.

The Commission said background research was already underway, with a consultation paper to be published early in autumn 2002 and final recommendations in March 2003.

However, the Commission has no power to require a change in ballot papers but will pass its final report on to the government and parliament for further consideration.

A spokeswoman for the Electoral Commission said the issue was being considered in response to suggestions that the low turn out in June 2001 was perhaps caused by dissatisfaction with the choices available as well as general public apathy.

The Electoral Commission said it will consider the "none of the above" option alongside wider reviews of the ballot and nomination papers.

The review of ballot papers will look at the design used in both traditional elections and for electronic voting.

And as well as the need and practicality of introducing positive abstention, it will also consider the order in which candidates' names appear and the use of serial numbered ballot papers.

The examination of nomination papers will focus on the current law for the nomination of candidates at elections and will provide the basis for the development of good practice guidance for electoral administrators.

Pamela Gordon, Electoral Commissioner and chair of both the reviews, said the examination covered "two areas of administration crucial to elections".

"The public's ability to access democracy is dependent upon their effectiveness. These reviews aim to promote and encourage good practice," she said.